Crescent Kashmir

Trump team ‘may have moved secret papers’ amid probe

Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

WASHINGTON: The US Justice Department said on Tuesday it had evidence that classified documents were deliberately concealed from the Federal Bureau of Investigation when it tried to retrieve them in June from former president Donald Trump’s Florida estate, prompting its unprecedented search of his home.

In a 54-page filing, prosecutors laid out their evidence of obstruction of justice, alleging publicly for the first time that Trump aides both falsely certified in June that the former president had returned all the government records he had stored in his home after leaving the White House last year.

It also revealed that Trump’s lawyers “explicitly prohibited government personnel from opening or looking inside any of the boxes” inside a storage room when FBI agents first travelled to his Palm Beach Mar-a-Lago resort in June to retrieve the records.

“The government also developed evi­dence that government records were likely concealed and removed from the storage room and that efforts were likely taken to obstruct the governments investigation,” the department said in a filing in district court in Florida.

It released a photograph of some of the records found inside Trump’s home bearing classification markings, some of which refer to clandestine human sources.

The Justice Department’s filings come ahead of a Thursday court hearing before judge Aileen Cannon in West Palm Beach. She is weighing Trump’s request to appoint a special master who would conduct a privilege review of the documents seized from Mar-a-Lago on Aug. 8, many of which are labelled as classified.

A special master is an independent third party sometimes appointed by a court in sensitive cases to review materials potentially covered by attorney-client privilege to ensure investigators do not improperly view them.

A special master was appointed, for instance, in the searches of the homes and offices of two of Trump’s former attorneys: Rudy Giuliani and Michael Cohen.

In Trump’s initial request to the court, his attorneys claimed that the former president wanted to protect materials that were subject to a legal doctrine known as executive privilege, which can shield some presidential communications.

Legal experts called that argument into question, saying it was illogical for a former president to claim he wanted to assert executive privilege against the executive branch itself.

Donald Trump’s legal team later narrowed its request, asking for a privilege review without explicitly referring to executive privilege.

The Justice Department said on Tuesday it opposed the appointment of a special master.

Trump, prosecutors argued, lacks standing in the case because the records “do not belong to him”.

The Aug 8 search of Trump’s home was a significant escalation of one of several federal and state investigations Trump is facing.

‘Classificaton markings’

In a redacted affidavit underpinning the search released publicly by the department last week, an unidentified FBI agent said the agency reviewed and identified 184 documents “bearing classification markings” after Trump in January returned 15 boxes of government records sought by the US National Archives.

After the National Archives discovered the classified material, some of which pertained to intelligence-gathering and clandestine human sources, it referred the matter to the FBI.

Published in Dawn, September 1st, 2022

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *